Only at the end age 34, I realised I do not have enough insurance coverage... by accident.
I thot I have bought something (indeed I bought some insurance) but it is an endowment with no critical illinesses coverage. So which means if I die today, my son got a mere sub RM40,000 and nothing else, if I were to be dignosed with critical illnesses, I got no insurance money except to rely on my savings...
That's sound very dangerous isn't it?
So what do I do? I went to find some insurance plans and needless to say, the oprtions are daunting. Ah, I mean I only compared 2 Insurance companies...
The first question agents always asked:"how much coverage do you want?", or "what budget do you have?" or "what do you want in your life"?
....errrr
Honestly, like buying clothes, I don't know. Maybe I need to see the clothes & to weigh the quality, the price and the value then only I can tell. More so as this is an insurance commitment of a life time, I think I need to do some research...
So how much do you think you need - in worst case senario
I asked about treatment of terminal cancer (in private hospital)
RM8000 a dose of chemo - until you die. Let's say if you can prolong your life for additional 6 months, so I guess RM48,000 in total if chemo is a monthly thing (but I don't think so)
RM4000 per treatment with medicine (and 2 treatments a month), RM96,000 a year if you can survive that long
I overheard at hospital few years back from those had kidney problem
RM2000 dialysis per month, RM25,000 a year
And that is only medical fee.
If you die, how much do you think your family need in order to survive?
With schooling kid?
If I don't die but lose my ability to work... and a family to feed
If I don't die but needs medical care for the rest of my life... and a family to feed
Oh no, I think I need a million ringgit then! Indeed.
Insurance agents advise to use your annual income x 3. That enough for your family to survive for 3 years (maybe a little longer if the family has less members because i died ). But what happens on the 4th year?
Without a clue... so it ended up with 4 sessions of discussions with 2 different agents, and more than 8 different plans... Hmm... I hope they don't hate me for shopping and comparing and evaluating and requoting and asking a lot of questions...
But there is some important learnings about insurance that I feel obliged to share:
1. Investment-linked insurance can fetch very high coverage at low and "fixed" premium but at the age of around 54-55, you may receive letter from insurance co. citing your premium is not enough to pay for the coverage. You choose to top up or terminate your coverage. But bear in mind at 50 onwards, it is the critical age that prone to illnesses. So do be clear on this.
2. Optimise your co. medical insurance coverage if your co. do provide one. Utilise the flexibility of investment-linked insurance to complement & adjust your coverage as and when needed.
3. Traditional life insurance charges a premium but protection increases as you age. Normally you can get back higher than your premium paid surrender value if you surrender after 15 years or so.
4. Found some good blogs explaining traditional insurance vs. Investment-link insurance, good read (simple explanation for dummies)
http://kclau.com/insurance/investment-linked-vs-traditional-insurance/
http://www.meshio.com/index.php/2006/05/investment-linked-insurance-policy-an-overview/ (and read all the related links)
OK.
At the end of today, after the 8 quotations, I still have not decided yet.
But the good thing is I am finally clear on what I want.
I need to protect my son for 23 years until he is independent, if I die or are ill.
I need to protect myself for 35 years with medical fee (if I can live that long) so that it won't be a burden to my family.
I need to make sure I have some money to enjoy life, or to live in old folk home if I don't die after my son is independent. I really do not want him to worry about me but to see me enjoying my retired life.
So it means when we buy insurance, we need not only think about coverage but also savings. Bad things do not always happen.
I told one of the agent that I will buy a traditional plan, he suggested for the same amount of money, why not I invest on the maximum coverage? Insurance is about coverage, if I want savings, I should go for retirement or other savings plan?
I totally disagree. It is true in terms of investment but not true in terms of REAL protection.
If we only have a fixed limited amount to spend every month, the best is to strike a balance between coverage & savings.
What if nothing really happen to me? At the age 60, I have used all my disposable income during my working years on insurance that does not give much return, but I can only get the return when I die (well I don't get it literally). What do I survive on if I don't die (yet)? Depend on my kid(s)? What if my children are not dependable? Or I do not want to burden them?
Thinking of spending all my available budget each month on plan that gives me nothing but probably will spoil my kid when I die... I am honestly hesitating.
I would split my budget between a traditional life insurance - that gives me increased protection and returns if I surrender my policy at the age of 60 or so, and an investment-linked insurance (with PA & medical) - that gives me maximum protection throughout my critial life (when my kid needs me most) with no return expectation.
So in any of the above listed scenarios, I think I would be well-protected - despite maybe partially.
Now I go study the remaining of the insurance plans.
:-)